.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

royal wedding ring

royal wedding ring. royal wedding ring replica.
  • royal wedding ring replica.



  • ThaDoggg
    Apr 26, 04:23 PM
    Oh well who cares besides shareholders? As long as we keep getting quality products with stable software we should be happy.





    royal wedding ring. Royal Wedding Rings
  • Royal Wedding Rings



  • 42streetsdown
    May 6, 01:48 AM
    This seems unlikely. The PPC to Intel switch was a result of Apple not being impressed by both IBM and Motorola's lack of interest in continuing the advances in the PowerPC architecture. Intel's current architecture and future planned architectures are still of great interest to apple and consumers. There isn't enough motivation (unless some huge new breakthrough in ARM tech is in the works.)
    The PPC-Intel transition was confusing for many consumers and a pain for developers. I don't think Apple is likely to put us through it again.





    royal wedding ring. kate william wedding ring.
  • kate william wedding ring.



  • Phil A.
    Apr 18, 03:02 PM
    Looking at the TouchWiz UI, I see your point.

    But, at what point does an interface become too generic? For example, the concept of pages of icons in a grid isn't really new or innovative. The concept of swiping across screens is simple and intuitive and should be copied for that exact reason. Should other phone makers put the icons in a circle, "just because" they need to be different? Should they force you to do something differently just because the best and most intuitive way was "already taken"?

    Everyone loves car analogies, so: what if Ford decided to sue other carmakers because they copied their steering wheel design? Would other companies have been forced to adopt other types of controls -- joysticks or dials or foot pedals, perhaps -- "just because"? And would that have been good for the auto industry?

    I sort of understand where you are coming from, but with a mobile device (or other computer), a major part of the design is the user interface and manufacturers should be able to protect that design. HTC have managed to make an interface that is in many ways better than iOS, but instead of any innovation at all, Samsung have just copied it.

    BTW, Early car design innovations were patented and the designers licensed them to other manufacturers.





    royal wedding ring. William#39;s Royal Wedding
  • William#39;s Royal Wedding



  • nanofrog
    Apr 23, 03:14 PM
    It makes a lot of sense. Quietly cooling two CPUs, a high-end GPU, 8 DIMMs and multiple drives in such a form factor makes me a little dubious. That and it seems pure hearsay on the part of 9 to 5 mac.

    Mods please don't lock this, discussion of Mac Pro related articles in the main news section is really hard to have as 90% of the posts are by people who have little interest or knowledge in the topic.
    I like the idea (exists with other cases, and the one's I'm thinking of, such as offerings from SuperMicro, work very well).

    My concern though, seems to be the same as yours. Specifically packing a workstation into a 3U enclosure. 4U or even 5U, fine, as there's sufficient space for full height PCIe cards and cooling (3U seems to tight though for a workstation that has to be planned thermally speaking with all slots filled).

    Yet another sign Apple is going to kill the Mac Pro.

    You'll see! With Final Cut Pro on it's deathbed there is no way the Mac Pro is sticking around!

    /s
    I get the sarcasm. My issues aren't with the concept of the case that's usable as both a tower or rackmount though.

    As far as the MP's continuation, it's to do with the direction Intel's going to meet enterprise customer requirements/requests that I've noticed (more cores than most workstation software can utilize, and the price is going up as a result). Add in Apple's margin on smaller unit sales vs. other workstation vendors, it doesn't look good.

    TB further complicates the issue, particularly when a single die consumer desktop CPU releases with 8 cores (not to far away), as the iMac could be considered as a replacement (not ideal, but functional enough for quite a few users).

    Keep in mind, creative professionals don't actually need ECC as the software's not based on recursion (worst case, flipped bits due to radiation cause a bad pixel here and there, not the entire image).

    doubtful, this is a key switcher market... it would be crazy to axe the very thing that will continue to switch the PC builders/gamers over the next 5 years... this is a key ingredient to apple taking the industry over with time.
    Not so much lately, given the pricing since 2009 (enthusiast users are being forced out due to costs). Even professionals (i.e. independents and SMB's <particularly S for small>) are feeling the pinch as well, going by posts here on MR.

    I think the iMac will take care of gamers...
    This is what Apple expects them to buy from what I can tell (i.e. SP MP is ~$1000USD more than a PC equivalent).

    You are essentially now using a PC with EFI firmware and OSX operating system. The only advantage over a hackintosh is that it's all fine tuned, modified and tested under one roof ....
    Exactly.

    From an electronics POV, the MP is made of the same equipment used in PC equivalents. Apple uses the case to distinguish it physically, and the firmware to lock OS X to the machine.

    The desktop market has been exhausted and its time passed anywhere, so now it's all about mobile and portable computing.
    This has been claimed for awhile, and in developed nations, it has its validity.

    But when you look to less developed nations, desktops still out-sell laptops due to more bang-for-the-buck (i.e. look at China; they're less likely to have more than one system, so they choose the desktop for more power at a lower cost = higher desktop sales currently). This will change over time, but by then, citizens of developed nations may be so poor, that we have to dump laptops and devices for desktops again. :eek: :D :p


    - Dust filters

    Definitely, given the cost of the MP.

    How does having the PSU on the bottom keep it cool?...

    Hot air rises, so the heat generated by the PSU will just rise and fill up the case.

    Unless I'm missing something or the laws of physics have changed in recent years?
    The PSU doesn't run as hot as the CPU or GPU (hot air from the boards rising into the PSU doesn't do it any favors). Hot air off of the PSU heat sinks can be exhausted before it ever rises to the boards. More of a win-win.

    Of course, by using baffling (separating the case into chambers), it won't matter that much anyway thermally speaking.

    But even with baffles, the layouts are improved with PSU's located on the bottom IMO.





    royal wedding ring. royal wedding ring kate
  • royal wedding ring kate



  • BeyondCloister
    Nov 22, 05:52 AM
    What's he banging on about? By "PC guys" who does he mean? Microsoft?

    Being a company that produces PDAs (Personal Digital Assistants) then he is probably refering to PCs actual meaning of Personal Computer (the term popularised by Apple Computer a long time ago).





    royal wedding ring. The Royal Wedding ring given
  • The Royal Wedding ring given



  • lilo777
    Apr 18, 04:54 PM
    lol I take it you DO think they look very similar. I see that they both use icons in a grid format. So tell me, what exactly are you suggesting would give LG the grounds for any kind of lawsuit? Or is it just the icons and grid (the rest of which has been done with phone interfaces before)?

    And if you still think LG would theoretically have a case, refer to babbit's post:


    I am not suggesting that LG has any merits for such lawsuit at all. I am suggesting the opposite - that Apple does not have any merits either.





    royal wedding ring. royal wedding ring kate
  • royal wedding ring kate



  • SockRolid
    May 7, 12:50 PM
    I agree, nuckinfutz. I signed up for the old, free, iTools during Steve's MWSF 2000 keynote (and got a great email address.) Basic services could easily be made free again, advanced services could cost a little. Apple makes most of their money from hardware sales, so it's possible that the free MobileMe component could add enough value to generate more hardware sales for Apple.

    Even if the extra initial cost to Apple outweighs the increase in hardware sales, it could be beneficial for Apple in the medium to long term. Because there's another potentially huge long-term benefit for Apple. If all or nearly all Apple customers join MobileMe, they will create a larger MobileMe market to sell into. By 'sell' I mean iAds. It's entirely possible that MobileMe could become completely free if you and I and other users are willing to put up with the fancy new iAds that Apple is working on.

    So what would make us put up with the iAds? Great content. We could stream movies, TV, and even audio when we're away from our Macs. Apple may not want to go 100% "cloud" since the "cloud" may never be 100% reliable. Apple no doubt wants to avoid the kind of disaster that Microsoft / Danger users experienced if at all possible.

    But if Apple does a few more deals in Hollywood, I wouldn't be surprised if MobileMe gets renamed to "The Apple Channel" or something like that. As internet media streaming becomes more popular, Apple will be able to use its MobileMe infrastructure to become even more of a media powerhouse. iAd commercials and all.





    royal wedding ring. royal wedding ring 2011.
  • royal wedding ring 2011.



  • roadbloc
    Apr 26, 04:12 PM
    Bound to happen. History repeating itself. Android or other tablet OS which works out cheaper and runs on any available hardware will overtake iOS in the tablet market eventually.





    royal wedding ring. Other Royal Wedding Rings
  • Other Royal Wedding Rings



  • tuna
    Mar 29, 09:12 AM
    And Amazon thinks crippling ioS compatibility will be good business? FAIL.

    I don't blame any company who looks at what Apple has done to people who are trying to create services for the iOS platform and decides that they don't want to go there.

    They hold up Google Voice and other apps in endless app review purgatories, embarrassing the companies that spent valuable resources developing them. They look at companies that have created amazing magazine apps or streaming media apps, and now they say that they demand the opportunity to market subscriptions to those services and take a 30% cut.

    Amazon looks at the situation and knows that Apple will very likely either hold up their app or demand a 30% cut of their subscription fees, and either case is unacceptable. This is especially likely to happen since this new Amazon service seems to compete directly with the cloud services that Apple is gearing up to offer.





    royal wedding ring. The wedding and engagement
  • The wedding and engagement



  • adztaylor
    Apr 18, 03:01 PM
    Waiting for Samsung to counter-sue for some frivolous reason in 3...2...1...

    The merry-go-round continues.





    royal wedding ring. royal wedding heats up,
  • royal wedding heats up,



  • bowens
    Sep 11, 01:24 PM
    this is probably old news but meh, what the hell:

    http://iphone.org

    Nobody else seems interested, so they must have already seen it, but I have not. That's pretty interesting.





    royal wedding ring. Royal Wedding ring replica.jpg
  • Royal Wedding ring replica.jpg



  • FaziBear
    Sep 15, 05:14 PM
    Yes finally! I think this makes sense, but then like all of you, this is just my opinion... anyways...

    LET THE COUTDOWN BEGIN!!!

    AGAIN...

    10 Days and counting.





    royal wedding ring. Fairytale Royal Wedding: Ring
  • Fairytale Royal Wedding: Ring



  • iGary
    Sep 11, 07:03 AM
    That's "head off", not "hedge off". You of all people should remember that...:)

    I write crap about boats - I'm a fracking pirate not an English major. :)





    royal wedding ring. royal wedding ring replica.
  • royal wedding ring replica.



  • ckeck
    Aug 3, 11:56 AM
    Why doesn't Apple just release a new battery?? ;)





    royal wedding ring. royal wedding ring replica.
  • royal wedding ring replica.



  • Michaelgtrusa
    Apr 5, 01:05 PM
    Not surprised! Toyota should not take it!





    royal wedding ring. Middleton Wedding Ring
  • Middleton Wedding Ring



  • CommodityFetish
    Apr 5, 08:30 PM
    Hmmm... I think I'll go jailbreak my iPod touch now.

    Maybe then I can get a toggle switch for wifi on my home screen. :rolleyes:





    royal wedding ring. Middleton#39;s ring is confirmed
  • Middleton#39;s ring is confirmed



  • lilo777
    Apr 18, 04:02 PM
    As it's already been said, Apple is protecting their IP and patents. If they don't show the effort, they run the risk of losing them. It's not a "Apple is evil" issue, it's how IP and patents work.

    There are several ways to lose a patent. One way is not to defend it. Another ways is trying to defend bogus patents and have the court invalidate it.





    royal wedding ring. Royal Wedding: Crown jewels:
  • Royal Wedding: Crown jewels:



  • Multimedia
    Aug 7, 07:22 PM
    In the past, Apple has always issued a "White Paper" on new leading products. I can't see the link for that yet. Anyone find it? :confused:





    royal wedding ring. Royal Wedding iPhone 4 case
  • Royal Wedding iPhone 4 case



  • Frobozz
    Aug 7, 05:25 PM
    what will happen if I use bootcamp and put in a PC grafic card?

    This is a good question. What happens if I put my x1900xt from my PC into one of these? Would it run under windows? If it would, then it should run under OS X with the correct driver, because it wouldn't be a hardware issue.

    I am willing to bet that, at least for the graphics cards with mac specific drivers, you could buy the PC equivalent. If you branch out to different model numbers, you might run into problems.

    Anyone have a MacPro they could lend me to test out my theory? :-)





    Chupa Chupa
    Aug 4, 12:45 PM
    Apple never was a part of Mhz rat-race. Look at its bestselling Powerbook. How fast was it compared to the then PC laptops. Anyways, WWDC is suppose to be developers conference, so we should speculate more about Leopard and hopefuly MacPros (because they are long due) insted of iPods and MBPs.


    Apple liked to downplay Mhz/Ghz because it knew there was no way the G3 and G4 PPCs could keep up with the P*. But when the G5 came along, what did Steve announce...that a 3Ghz chip would be ready in a year. Of course that never happened. The G5 never made it out of the high 2 GHz even three years after he made that statement. And THAT is the reason why we now have Intel Macs.

    Moreover, now that PCs and Macs use the same chips Apple HAS to use the latest and greatest chips to keep up. It's not really a matter of playing the Ghz game. That game is over now that there is chip parity. But the first thing a company like Apple that basks in it's "cutting edge"/"trendy" glow must have is computers with the best chips.

    Also, WWDC is about DEVELOPERS. Developers of software and hardware for all Apple products. So I think it's silly to limit speculation (especially since its all speculation) to only a few products. Theoretically every piece of Apple hardware is up for revision, not to mention possible new ones.





    dethmaShine
    Mar 27, 01:00 PM
    Release a new phone and make the people wait for months for the new OS? WTH?

    I thought WebOS and H/Palm already had that market cornered.

    Who made the rule that both the software and the hardware have to be released on the same date?

    I guess this never happened with the mac lineup. The hardware was always released before and after the software.





    miles01110
    Apr 25, 08:51 AM
    Yes. I'm sure that consolidated.db just appeared randomly and it's all a huge media conspiracy.





    Multimedia
    Sep 16, 05:14 AM
    You may be right about the 160 GB HDD option and the X1800.

    There is no way the MBP's will recieve resolution upgrades before Leopard. Santa Rosa MBP's will definiantly be bumped to 1680x1050 and 1920x1200. Tiger is resolution dependent, which means that a higher DPI would make it nearly impossible to see anything.Tiger also has a lot of controls to increase system level font sizes plus ZOOM so I don't think going higher res would be a problem with Tiger.

    But please tell us more of what you know about resolution independence with Leopard and what new display technologies coming next year?At last, why 26th-30th? Why would Apple have a large event where it would be appropriate to release MBP's, and then instead announce 1-4 days after? I believe it might be a few days prior to Photokina, as the iMac was before the Paris Expo.;)Agreed.





    miamialley
    May 4, 04:30 PM
    No thanks, that would use a bunch of my 30gb monthly limit (no other options for broadband where i live). I definately would prefer a usb stick or a dvd. At least if its download only I hope they make it easy for me to burn to a standard size disc

    30GB? Where do you live and who's the provider?